Crypto exchange HTX is set to delist the USD1 stablecoin, issued by World Liberty Financial (WLFI), and will convert eligible user holdings to USDT on a 1:1 basis. This action follows a significant dispute where WLFI reportedly froze HTX-linked on-chain addresses, citing sanctions compliance reviews. The exchange has stated its intention to proceed with the delisting and conversion by June 7th, 3:00 UTC, having already suspended trading for several USD1 pairs earlier in the week.
Key Takeaways
- HTX will delist the USD1 stablecoin and convert user holdings to USDT at a 1:1 ratio on June 7.
- The delisting is a response to World Liberty Financial (WLFI) freezing HTX-linked on-chain addresses.
- HTX asserts that WLFI’s actions were unilateral, lacked due process, and infringed on user rights.
- The dispute involves allegations of sanctions compliance reviews by WLFI, though HTX claims the frozen assets belong to individual users and not sanctioned entities.
- This incident follows a prior freezing of Justin Sun’s wallet by WLFI, leading to legal action from Sun against the project.
According to HTX’s statement, the WLFI project team, which is reportedly closely associated with the Trump family, unilaterally froze specific HTX on-chain addresses. HTX argues that these actions were taken without adequate prior communication, sufficient contractual or legal justification, transparent disclosure, or adherence to due process. The exchange contends that this directly impacts the rights and assets of its users.
A spokesperson for HTX clarified that the frozen assets in question do not belong to any sanctioned entity but are legitimate holdings of individual users. The exchange has formally requested that WLFI immediately unfreeze these assets. This situation arises in the context of broader regulatory scrutiny, including the UK’s recent designation of Huobi Global S.A. for alleged facilitation of Russian sanctions evasion. HTX, however, maintains that it is a separate entity from the sanctioned Huobi Global S.A. and that its operations and user funds remain unaffected.
This is not the first instance of WLFI employing its on-chain freeze functionality. In September 2025, the project froze the wallet of Tron founder Justin Sun after he moved substantial amounts of WLFI, including to HTX. Sun has subsequently initiated legal proceedings against WLFI, alleging the existence of a hidden backdoor in the project’s contract that allows the team to freeze investor tokens without consent.
World Liberty Financial has not yet issued a public statement specifically addressing the HTX freeze. The project did, however, post a general reminder on June 3 regarding its maintenance of sanctions compliance controls and the potential blocking of transactions involving sanctioned entities, without naming any specific parties.
Regulatory Precedent and Legal Stakes
The dispute between HTX and World Liberty Financial highlights the complex legal and operational challenges within the cryptocurrency industry, particularly concerning stablecoins, asset freezes, and sanctions compliance. For HTX, the immediate legal stake involves protecting its users’ assets and maintaining operational integrity against what it perceives as an unjustified unilateral action by a token issuer. The exchange’s public stance emphasizes its commitment to due process and user rights, suggesting potential legal recourse if the situation is not resolved favorably.
For World Liberty Financial and the USD1 stablecoin, the ongoing actions carry significant reputational and legal risks. The ability to unilaterally freeze on-chain assets, while ostensibly for compliance purposes, raises serious questions about control, transparency, and the security of user funds. If WLFI is found to have acted improperly or outside of legal frameworks, it could face substantial penalties, regulatory investigations, and civil litigation. The alleged involvement of a hidden backdoor in the WLFI contract, as claimed by Justin Sun, further exacerbates these risks, pointing to potential securities law violations and breaches of contract.
This situation could set a regulatory precedent for how stablecoin issuers and exchanges interact when faced with compliance demands or disputes. Regulators worldwide, including those implementing frameworks like the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, are increasingly focused on the stability and security of stablecoins and the accountability of their issuers. The case underscores the need for clear, internationally recognized standards for asset freezes, sanctions compliance, and dispute resolution mechanisms within the digital asset space. The legal stakes are high, as a lack of clear guidelines could lead to further fragmentation of regulatory approaches and increased uncertainty for market participants.
Learn more at : www.theblock.co