Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey has indicated an anticipated international disagreement with the United States regarding the regulatory standards for stablecoins. Speaking at a Bank of England conference, Bailey expressed concerns that U.S.-based stablecoins, particularly those with redemption difficulties, could pose a risk to jurisdictions like the UK during periods of financial instability.
Key Takeaways
- Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey anticipates significant international discussions, describing a “wrestle,” with the U.S. over the establishment of global stablecoin regulations.
- Bailey highlighted a specific concern: the potential for U.S. stablecoins with complex redemption processes to create systemic risk if they flood into other markets during a crisis.
- These statements coincide with legislative developments in the U.S., including upcoming markups for stablecoin legislation, and the UK’s ongoing efforts to develop its own stablecoin regulatory framework.
Governor Bailey articulated that for stablecoins to function effectively within the global payment system, international standards are a prerequisite. He chairs the Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body that monitors and makes recommendations about the global financial system. Bailey specifically pointed to a vulnerability: certain U.S. stablecoins may not be easily convertible to U.S. dollars without the involvement of a cryptocurrency exchange, thereby potentially limiting their liquidity in a crisis scenario.
He posited that if dollar-pegged stablecoins achieve widespread adoption for cross-border transactions, a financial downturn could lead to a rapid movement away from tokens with uncertain redemption guarantees toward jurisdictions that enforce more stringent convertibility rules. Bailey stated, “We know what would happen if there was a run on a stablecoin — they’d all turn up here,” implying a potential influx into the UK.
This stance aligns with Bailey’s previous communications. In July 2025, he cautioned major global banks against issuing their own stablecoins, instead advocating for the development of tokenized deposits. Subsequently, six prominent UK banks have initiated a pilot program for tokenized sterling deposits, reflecting this preference.
The United Kingdom has been concurrently developing its own stablecoin regulatory framework, running parallel to legislative efforts in the U.S. The Bank of England initiated a consultation in November on proposed rules for “systemic” sterling stablecoins, which included proposed holding limits of £20,000 for individuals and £10 million for businesses. Following industry feedback, the central bank indicated in March a willingness to reconsider these caps, with revised draft rules anticipated around June.
Under the UK’s proposed regime, systemic stablecoin issuers would be required to maintain at least 40% of their reserves in non-interest-bearing accounts at the Bank of England, with the remaining reserves held in short-term UK government debt. This structure is designed to ensure prompt redemption capabilities. In contrast, the U.S. legislative proposals, such as the GENIUS Act, mandate 100% reserve backing and monthly disclosures, but do not explicitly require direct redemption from issuers without intermediaries.
The divergence in regulatory approaches is partly attributable to differing legislative timelines. President Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law in July 2025, and the FDIC proposed related implementation rules in April. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the broader CLARITY Act on Thursday, following a bipartisan agreement on stablecoin yield that resolved a months-long legislative impasse.
Bailey’s remarks were delivered on the same day that European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde presented her most direct argument to date against stablecoins, asserting that even euro-denominated tokens pose risks to financial stability and the transmission of monetary policy. Collectively, these statements represent a significant pushback from senior European financial authorities against a stablecoin regulatory landscape potentially dominated by U.S. terms.
Potential Regulatory Precedent
The differing approaches to stablecoin regulation between the UK, Europe, and the U.S. are likely to set significant precedents for global digital asset governance. The UK’s emphasis on direct convertibility and specific reserve requirements, contrasted with the U.S. focus on reserve backing and disclosures, highlights a fundamental disagreement on risk management. The Financial Stability Board’s role will be critical; its ability to foster a consensus through its standard-setting process, despite historical U.S. reluctance to cede domestic policy control to multilateral frameworks, will determine the extent to which Bailey’s call for international standards influences future regulations. This transatlantic tension could lead to fragmented regulatory environments, impacting the growth and interoperability of stablecoins globally.
Details can be found on the website : www.theblock.co