President Donald Trump’s recent public endorsement of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) stance on prediction markets is unlikely to significantly alter the ongoing legal disputes concerning event contracts, according to analysis from TD Cowen. The firm suggests that the ultimate resolution of this matter will likely rest with the Supreme Court, with states maintaining a strong position in the regulatory conflict.
Key Takeaways
- TD Cowen asserts that President Trump’s support for the CFTC’s position on prediction markets will not substantially impact the broader legal battles.
- The future of prediction markets is expected to be determined by the Supreme Court.
- States currently appear to hold a favorable position in the regulatory contest over event contracts.
The commentary from TD Cowen follows a statement by President Trump on his social media platform, Truth Social, emphasizing the “critically important” nature of the CFTC’s exclusive authority over prediction markets. This statement arises amidst ongoing legal challenges brought by several states against prediction market platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. These cases question whether event contracts fall under federal commodities law or state-level gambling regulations.
TD Cowen’s analysis indicates that President Trump’s support for the CFTC’s jurisdictional claims was anticipated. Jaret Seiberg, managing director at TD Cowen’s Washington Research Group, noted in a report that the firm had consistently assumed President Trump backed CFTC Chair Michael Selig’s advocacy for prediction markets, including the assertion that states lack the authority to prohibit event contracts related to sporting events. Seiberg suggested that Selig’s aggressive promotion of prediction markets would have been difficult without implicit backing from the administration.
Furthermore, Seiberg posited that President Trump’s statement may have been more of a defense of Chair Selig, particularly in light of a recent investigative report on the CFTC’s handling of cryptocurrency and prediction markets, rather than an attempt to enact a significant policy shift. Seiberg anticipates that the investigative report will likely serve as a foundation for future Democratic inquiries.
Potential Regulatory Precedent
The intervention by President Trump, while notable, is seen by TD Cowen as having minimal impact on the fundamental legal trajectory. Seiberg explained that the core issue is now situated within the federal court system, moving beyond the purview of regulators and the executive branch. He reiterated his belief that the Supreme Court will ultimately adjudicate the extent to which federal legislation establishing event contracts preempts state laws concerning sports gambling.
TD Cowen maintains that states currently possess a stronger argument in this regulatory dispute, given their historical role in overseeing sports gambling. The firm estimates that the litigation process could extend for two years or more before a definitive conclusion is reached. This perspective aligns with previous assessments from Seiberg, who, following a Senate Commerce hearing on prediction markets, highlighted an increasing legislative risk driven by growing frustration in Washington, while also suggesting that significant congressional action is unlikely until the Supreme Court clarifies the regulatory landscape for sports-related event contracts. Consequently, the firm anticipates that any substantial legislative developments might not materialize until 2027 or later, despite potential political attention in the near term.
Earlier in the year, Seiberg had also expressed skepticism regarding the passage of proposed U.S. bills targeting prediction markets, including those aimed at banning sports and political event contracts. He cautioned that policy risks remain elevated, with the 2028 election potentially presenting a more significant threat due to bipartisan concerns over prediction markets circumventing state gambling regulations.
It is important to note that the White House is currently reviewing a new CFTC proposal designed to establish guidelines for prediction markets and event contracts. This proposal is undergoing review by the Office of Management and Budget before being opened for public comment. In separate commentary, Seiberg also addressed the Clarity Act, a proposed crypto market structure bill, expressing concern that political controversies involving President Trump and his administration could hinder Democratic support for the legislation, making its passage this year improbable.
Details can be found on the website : www.theblock.co